Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Propensity score matching and inverse-probability weighting are popular methods for causal inference in observational studies. Under the assumption of unconfoundedness, these methods enable researchers to estimate causal effects by balancing observed covariates across different treatment values. While their extensions to general treatment regimes exist, a vast majority of applications have been confined to a binary treatment. Moreover, applied researchers often dichotomize a non-binary treatment in order to utilize propensity score methods. Balancing covariates with respect to the dichotomized treatment, however, does not imply that they are balanced regarding the original non-binary treatment variable. In this paper, we extend the covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology of Imai and Ratkovic (2014) to general treatment regimes. Specifically, we estimate the generalized propensity score such that the resulting association between a treatment and covariates is minimized. Two social science applications are used to demonstrate that the CBPS methodology significantly improves covariate balance and offer substantive insights the original analyses fail to identify. The proposed methodology is implemented through publicly available open-source software.
منابع مشابه
Parametric and Nonparametric Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes∗
Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology weakens this assumption by directly optimizing sample covariate b...
متن کاملCovariate balancing propensity score
The propensity score plays a central role in a variety of causal inference settings. In particular, matching and weighting methods based on the estimated propensity score have become increasingly common in the analysis of observational data. Despite their popularity and theoretical appeal, the main practical difficulty of these methods is that the propensity score must be estimated. Researchers...
متن کاملCovariate Balancing Propensity Score for a Continuous Treatment: Application to the Efficacy of Political Advertisements∗
Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for the propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology increases the robustness to model misspecification by directl...
متن کاملImproving Covariate Balancing Propensity Score: A Doubly Robust and Efficient Approach
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a popular method for estimating causal effects in many disciplines. However, empirical studies show that the IPTW estimators can be sensitive to the misspecification of propensity score model. To address this problem, several researchers have proposed new methods to estimate propensity score by directly optimizing the balance of pre-treatment...
متن کاملDifferent Methods of Balancing Covariates Leading to Different Effect Estimates in the Presence of Effect Modification
A number of covariate-balancing methods, based on the propensity score, are widely used to estimate treatment effects in observational studies. If the treatment effect varies with the propensity score, however, different methods can give very different answers. The authors illustrate this effect by using data from a United Kingdom-based registry of subjects treated with anti-tumor necrosis fact...
متن کامل